Scientific Journal of Islamic Management

Scientific Journal of Islamic Management

Editor's Note (Must Stand Up; From Social Mission to Institutional Distortion)

Editor-in-Chief Lecture

Author
Editor-in-Chief of the Islamic Management Scientific Journal, Professor, Department of Public Policy and Administration, Head of the UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The increasing complexity of public issues and the plurality of influential actors in the field of governance have made the transition from traditional and centralized models of public administration an inevitable necessity. Relying on the theory of "Network Governance" and its key concepts such as stakeholder participation, consensus building, interdependence, and trans-governance, this article analyzes the relationship between "social capacity" and "institutional capacity" in the governance system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The fundamental issue of the research is the significant gap between the high capacity of social participation of Iranian society and the inadequacy of the capacity of coordinating and consensus-building institutions; a phenomenon known in the governance literature as "Institutional Distortion." Using an analytical-critical approach and relying on his own lived experience, the author interprets the widespread and unique presence of the Iranian people in recent social events, especially after the martyrdom of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution, as a manifestation of "social mission" and the slogan "must rise" as a strategic call to recreate the governance paradigm. The findings are organized into eight analytical axes: the necessity of developing consensus-building capacities, managing intra-discursive plurality and safeguarding national unity, the ethic of service and the primacy of mission over responsibility, explaining the relationship between advice, consultation, and obedience in Islamic governance, transitioning from informal networks of influence to institution-based governance, preventing participatory fatigue, building elite capacity through the "Mother of Governance Think Tank" project, and recreating the governance paradigm to address the imbalance of social-institutional capacity. The article concludes that the main challenge of governance in Iran is not the lack of social participation, but the weakness in converting this capital into sustainable institutional capacity, and the solution to confronting institutional distortion is not to adapt social capacity to existing institutions, but to reconstruct and upgrade institutions in line with the participation-oriented ideals of the Islamic Revolution. In this regard, the formation of a "High Commission for Reforming the Structure of the Public Administration System" is proposed with a cross-sectoral and cross-power approach; a mechanism that can elevate religious democracy from the level of an ideal to an institutionalized and lived experience and pave the way for the realization of a model of Islamic, popular, and inspiring governance.
Keywords
Subjects

Smiley face

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543571.
Crozier, M., Huntington, S. P., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The crisis of democracy: Report on the governability of democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York University Press.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 6675.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1. Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 319.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony. In H. P. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 101116). Manchester University Press.
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, politics and the state (2nd ed.). Red Globe Press.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229252.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1922)
Volume 33, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
Winter 2026
Winter 2026
Pages 11-40

  • Receive Date 26 July 2026
  • Publish Date 23 July 2026