Recognize the policy pattern in the waqf entity To develop general models of promotion and dissemination of policies

Document Type : Original Article


1 PhD of evaluating and measuring, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran

2 assistant professor at Transformation Center, Imam Hussein Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran

3 Master of human resource management, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran


Promoting policy is one of the most important challenges for the country's policy-making system and has imposed huge costs on the authorities. A historical study can conclude that waqf, as one of the traditions endorsed by the Holy Qur'an, has high capacities and capabilities to institutionalize, maintain and expand self-regulation based self-knowledge that can be considered a successful model of the policy cycle.
In this research, in addition to the historical-analytical study of waqf and its role in the formation of Islamic civilization, it was recognized based on interviews with experts using the content analysis method of model promotion and policy dissemination in waqf. In the final model, the components of diffusion in endowment formulation (endowment) are introduced based on four components of sustainable public need, individual-transition policy, trust management, network support, and objectivity along with reliability and visibility.


Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research,3, 385-405
Beltran, Luis Ramiro, S. (1976). Alien Premises, Objects, and Methods in Latin American Communication Research. Communication and Development: Critical Perspectives, pp. 15-42. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. 120 Srinivas R. Melkote
Diaz-Bordenave, J. (1976). Communication for Agricultural Innovations in Latin America. In E. M. Rogers
(ed.), Communication and Development: Critical Perspectives, pp. 43-62. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. (1980). Participation in Communication Systems for Development. Unpublished paper. Rio de Janeiro.
Fjes, Fred (1976). Communications and Development. Unpublished paper. Urbana-Champaign: College of Communications, University of Illinois.
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Volume 1).
Friesen, E. (1999). Exploring the Links between Structuration Theory and Participatory Action Research. Theoretical Approaches to Participatory Communication, pp. 281-308.
Hagen, Everett E. (1962). On the Theory of Social Change. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Inkeles, Alex (1966). The Modernization of Man. In M. Weiner (ed.), Modernization: The Dynamics of Growth, pp. 138-50. New York: Basic Books.
Jacobson, T.L. (2003). Participatory Communication for Social Change: The Relevance of the Theory of Communicative Action. In P.J. Kalbfleisch (ed.), Communication Yearbook (Volume 27), pp. 87-123.
Kotler, P. (1984). Social Marketing of Health Behavior. In L.W. Frederiksen, L.J. Solomon and K.A. Brehony (eds), Marketing Health Behavior, pp. 23-39. New York: Plenum Press.
Lerner, Daniel. (1958). The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.
McClelland,David C.)1966).The Impulse to Modernization.In M.Weiner (ed.),Modernization: The Dynamics of Growth, pp. 28-39. New York: Basic Books.
Melkote,S. and H.L.Steeves. (2001). Communication for Development in the Third World: Theory and Practice for Empowerment. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Nordenstreng,Kaarle. (1968). Communication Research in the United States:A Critical Perspective.Gazette,14: 207-18.
Piotrow, P. T. D.L. Kincaid, J.G. Rimon II and W. Rinehart. (1997). Health Communication: Lessons from Family Planning and Reproductive Health. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Rogers, E.M. and F.F. Shoemaker. (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross Cultural Approach. NewYork: Free Press.
Rogers, E.M. and R. Adhikarya. (1979). Diffusion of Innovations: An Up-to-date Review. In D. Nimmo
Rogers, Everett M. and D. Lawrence Kincaid. (1981). Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: The Free Press.
Rogers (ed.), Communication and Development: Critical Perspectives, pp. 121-48. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications..(1976b).The Passing of the Dominant Paradigm: Reflections on Diffusion Research in W
.Schramm and D. Lerner (eds), Communication and Change, pp. 49-52. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 
Rogers, Everett M. and D. Lawrence Kincaid. (1976c). Where are We in Understanding the Diffusion of
Innovations? In W. Schramm and D. Lerner (eds), Communication and Change, pp. 204-22. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
Rogers, Everett M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Shore, Larry. (1980). Mass Media for Development: A Re-examination of Access, Exposure, and Impact. In
Emile G. McAnany (ed.), Communications in the Rural Third World, pp. 19-45. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Singhal, A. and E. M. Rogers. (2003). Empowerment and Communication: Lessons Learned from Organizing
for Social Change. In P.J. Kalbfleisch (ed.), Communication Yearbook (Volume 27), pp. 67-85. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates/Publishers.
Singhal, Arvind and Everett M. Rogers. (1999). Entertainment-Education: A Communication Strategy for
Social Change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates.
Tichenor, P.J. G. Donahue and C. Olien. (1970). Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge.
Wang, Georgette and Wimal Dissanayake. (1984). Culture, Development and Change: Some Explorative
Observations. In G. Wang and W. Dissanayake (eds). Continuity and Change in Communication Systems.
Weiner, Myron (ed.) (1966). Modernization: The Dynamics of Growth. New York: Basic Books.
White, S.A. (1994). Introduction: The concept of participation. In White, S.A. K. S. Nair, and J. Ascroft (eds),
Participatory Communication: Working for Change and Development, pp. 15-32. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Wilkins, K.G. (1999). Development Discourse on Gender and Communication in Strategies for Social
Change. Journal of Communication, 49 (1): 46-68.
Zimmerman, M.A. and Rappaport, J.A. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5): 725-50.